Sales Rewards

Are your sales rewards incentives motivating the Gen Ys in your organization? Gen X? Boomers?

Sales Rewards Preferences by Generation - Research Report

You may be surprised! Download a free copy of our Sales Rewards Preferences by Generation research report here!

From Dave Brookmire

Get Dr. Dave Brookmire's latest book Coaching for Success!

Dr. Dave Brookmire's Coaching for Success

Learn more here!

Newsletter

Keep up to date on Generational DNA news, Subscribe to our newsletter.


Receive HTML?

Follow GenDNA

Test Your Generational IQ

Test Your Generational IQ

Research Surveys

Buyer Preferences Research Survey

Uncover how multigenerational values, needs and preferences impact sales effectiveness, the weighting of purchase criteria by generation, and how common myths are transferred across generations.

Participate in the Survey Here!

CPS

Learn more about GenerationalDNA parent company Corporate Performance Strategies here! 

Corporate Performance Strategies  

CPS is an Atlanta based business enhancement and executive coaching services firm that helps clients optimize their corporate DNA, harness their existing strengths and combine solid infrastructure with new thinking and competitive strategy.

We are Corporate Performance Strategies.  We have your solution. 

Archive for the ‘Workforce Knowledge Transfer’ Category

Generational Shift Impacts: U.S. Job Satisfaction At Lowest Level In Two Decades

Tuesday, January 12th, 2010 by admin

This blog - and this entire site - is dedicated to researching and analyzing the ways in which the changing generational makeup of the workforce affects businesses in both everyday operations and long-term strategy and planning. In a lot of areas it is obvious that generational behaviors, preferences and differences are going to have an effect, such as communication preferences, flexible work schedules, working styles, etc.

However, this generational shifting is impacting and will increasingly impact businesses in ways that may not be overtly obvious to all managers or executive teams. Take the article below as an example. The report mentioned in the article below states that US job satisfaction is at a twenty year low and that managers need to be wary of this, not only in terms of reduced productivity and efficiency in an already difficult economy, but also in terms of talent and knowledge loss as the economy rebounds.

Managers who are not taking into account the generational workplace preferences of its employees or who are not creating an environment that supports and cultivates multiple work-styles and approaches will find themselves rapidly losing what talent they have as the economy turns around and new opportunities arise in the market. Furthermore, managers who are not focused on long term knowledge transfer management, mentoring and talent development now will have a difficult time attracting top talent and maintaining uninterrupted operational coherency when the market turns around (not only will the Boomers be more comfortable with retiring, but younger talent will be looking for the best opportunities with the growing companies). As the article explains (read full article here):

“While one in 10 Americans is now unemployed, their working compatriots of all ages and incomes continue to grow increasingly unhappy,” says Lynn Franco, director of the Consumer Research Center of The Conference Board. “Through both economic boom and bust during the past two decades, our job satisfaction numbers have shown a consistent downward trend.”

Fewer Americans are satisfied with all aspects of their employment, and no age or income group is immune. In fact, the youngest cohort of employees (those currently under age 25) expresses the highest level of dissatisfaction ever recorded by the survey for that age group.

“The downward trend in job satisfaction could spell trouble for the overall engagement of U.S. employees and ultimately employee productivity,” adds Franco.

“These numbers do not bode well given the multi-generational dynamics of the labor force,” says Linda Barrington, managing director, Human Capital, The Conference Board. “The newest federal statistics show that baby boomers will compose a quarter of the U.S. workforce in eight years, and since 1987 we’ve watched them increasingly losing faith in the workplace.” Twenty years ago, some 60 percent of that generation was satisfied with their jobs. Today, that figure is roughly 46 percent. Barrington adds: “The growing dissatisfaction across and between generations is important to address because it can directly impact the quality of multi-generational knowledge transfer–which is increasingly critical to effective workplace functioning.”

If you aren’t considering the effects of the generational shift on your organization, now is the time! Don’t be caught in a situation in which knowledge is lost, talent is not developed, and employee satisfaction and productivity are low! Businesses, now more than ever need to be focused on the generational issues at play in the economy and in their organization, and plan for the future by investing in talent development and knowledge transfer management. Although, as the first story indicates, businesses are increasingly cutting consulting budgets to save costs, this will not be a solid strategy for many organizations in the long term.

Knowledge Gap: “Corporate America Worries About the Coming Brain Drain”

Monday, January 4th, 2010 by admin

This is a subject that I have been talking about for several years that is now starting to gain momentum in the media. The shifting generations in the workforce not only create the new management issues and challenges that we have been discussing here: team building, communication differences, working styles, etc. It also presents a very real challenge that most businesses haven’t had time to face while trying to survive the recent economic slump.

The interesting challenge of the shifting multi-generational workforce is this: the Baby Boomers are by far the largest of the current generations. As they begin their mass exodus from the workforce, they take with them years and years of knowledge and experience. Many companies will be sorely hit by this loss as the Boomers were more likely to stay with a certain companies for many years (sometimes for the majority of their careers). Companies that have not invested in mentoring or knowledge transfer programs will be facing quite a challenge as this knowledge exits their company, creating a knowledge gap. This knowledge gap not only includes internal strategies and operational knowledge, but in many cases also includes long-term client relationships, sales strategies and knowledge the directly impacts the bottom line.

As companies begin to replace the Boomers with the younger Gen Ys and Gen Xers, they will need to address these issues. Those with the capital to invest should keep long term employees on hand for talent development and mentoring, either in consultancy or part time roles. But for those who still have not recovered from the economic downturn enough to invest capital into this kind of training, the solution is not that simple. The economic slump has recently added another interesting piece to this puzzle, in that many who were approaching retirement were no longer able to afford retirement (via lost stocks, retirement funds, increased cost of living, etc) which has delayed the entry of many younger workers into the workforce and by extension delayed knowledge transfer and training. Recent articles from US News and World Report and TrueSlant.com describe this situation:

There’s been a lot of attention in this recession paid to seniors who are delaying retirement, and for good reason. Reporter Emily Brandon, writing in U.S. News & World Report in September, said the impact of keeping older adults in the workforce is that younger ones are kept out. Her story was based on research done by the Pew Research Center, which released a survey this past fall that showed most adults between the ages of 50 and 61 were considering working during the traditional retirement years. At the same time, more than four in 10 non-workers between the ages of 16-24 told Pew they had tried without success to find a job. Brandon wrote that for older workers, the decision to stay on the job isn’t always economic, although seventeen percent said they need the paycheck and another 27 percent said they were motivated to continue working by a mix of desire and need. That’s 44 percent working because of (or at least partly because of) financial reasons; 87 percent of employers said employees are working longer in order to rebuild their retirement nest eggs. When the economy begins to recover and the recession fades, will those seniors start retiring in droves?

Corporate America appears concerned that’s how things will shake out. According to MetLife’s Emerging Retirement Model Study, released Tuesday, employers today are deeply anxious and concerned about the impact of the knowledge drain on their organizations. When asked which of two retirement-related issues – delayed retirement or the knowledge drain – are of greatest concern today, 74 percent said it was the knowledge drain, as older workers retire. In fact 70 percent of employers surveyed anticipate that will be their biggest concern in the next 3-5 years. MetLife commissioned the survey of 240 employers to examine their attitudes and behaviors towards the aging workforce in the midst of a deep economic crisis.

Ironically, despite all their fears, 97 percent of companies surveyed have done little, if anything, to figure out how to transfer knowledge from older workers to younger workers, including calculating the cost. Last August The Conference Board in New York released a report, “Bridging the Gaps: How to Transfer Knowledge in Today’s Multigenerational Workplace”—that showed most companies had no plan to manage and transfer knowledge held by senior people. The result, concluded the report, “can be a significant drain of business wisdom that decreases innovation, lowers growth capacity, and reduces efficiency in the organization.” About 75 million boomers are poised to retire and as the economic recovery takes shape, those who delayed will likely begin moving on.

The article goes on to point out that many companies have not begun to address this issue because they are uncertain about cost or about where to start. However, companies that delay this process will fall behind companies who have integrated this process into their core operations, especially as the economy begins to rebound. We will be continuing to comment on this subject as the economy changes and media coverage increases.